White House science advisers call for ‘AI Bill of Rights’

The Biden administration is exploring a “bill of rights” to govern facial recognition and other potentially dangerous uses of artificial intelligence, but the problems with AI are far more important than figuring out how to regulate new technology.

The big picture: There is no good way to regulate the role of AI in forming a fair and equitable society without deciding what that society should look like, including how power should be balanced among individuals, businesses. and the government.

Driving the news: The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy yesterday launched a fact-finding mission that will ultimately result in a “‘bill of rights’ to guard against the powerful technologies we have created,” wrote the director of the White House. ‘OSTP Eric Lander and his deputy Alondra Nelson in an editorial published by Wired yesterday.

What they say : “It’s important to start conversations about what’s okay – and what’s not acceptable – about AI and our personal data now, before it’s too late,” says Sanjay Gupta, global head of product development and company at Mitek Systems, a leader in digital identity verification. .

  • “Companies will find nice ways to continue to innovate and integrate these technologies,” he said.

Biggest AI Boosters may fall victim to a kind of techno-solutionism – expecting technology to effectively solve structural and societal problems.

  • Yes, but: At the same time, however, focusing too narrowly on AI applications risks leading to reverse techno-solutionism – believing that the fastest way to solve social problems is to tweak the technologies that affect them, rather than the often intractable problems that underlie them.

Recall: The original Bill of Rights is nearly 230 years old, and we are still debating the meaning of almost every one of its 652 words.

  • While an AI Bill of Rights is our ultimate goal, we are still at the stage of haggling the Articles of Confederation.

Leave a Comment